John Stossel gets it, and he nails it in this piece

After I saw a report that Al Gore want’s to extricate $13 Trillion from the globe’s nations to fight the sham he calls Global Warming, I came across John Stossel’s op-ed on the Earth Day Loons. YES, $13,000,000,000,000.  Count ’em, 12 zeroes!  They should just give ME the 13T, and I’ll fight global warming until the cows come home.  I will distribute it as I see fit.  No worries, none of my friends or family will get any contracts.  Contracts for what?  Well, there will have to be a global police force assembled.  That’ll be expensive.  How about the temporary relocation of polar bears and penguins?  You know, the ones who are clinging to life on a tiny piece of floating ice in the melting arctic.  Of course we would have to build a solar, wind, geo-thermal powered climate controlled habitat for these poor animals.  Just to get us over the hump.  I’ll let you know when we’re ready to wean them back to nature.

One of the good guys
Anyway, enough of my crappy writing and read this guy’s article, it is right on the mark.

John Stossel: Earth Day resurrects cockamamie warming claims

 

Share the Lunacy

What scientists, Bernie? The ones who are handsomely compensated for their work?

Bernie and the DonaldIs there any end to this nonsense? Fine, so the climate is changing! Big deal, it has probably changed a billion times over the course of the earth’s life!  Here, THIS looks like some interesting reading.  YES, we all want to keep the Earth clean and breatheable and “cool”, but you can’t have my money to do it!  If there was a Fu**ing meteor the size of Manhattan barreling our way, and we had two weeks to stop it, and ALL of the scientists agreed, then TAKE MY MONEY to pulverize it with a nuke or two!  THAT would be an imminent threat.

CLICK HERE FOR THE LUNACY

 

Share the Lunacy

It looks like Joe Bastardi Read My Post on Climate Change

Climate Change Skeptic
A fellow “denier” Jo Bastardi wrote a piece which parallels my views on global warming. Click here to see more articles on our take of Climate Change.

Share the Lunacy

Al Franken tries to smugly question Neil Gorsuch in confirmation hearing, laughable.

 

Just look at these two men side by side, Al Franken has no business even being in the same room as someone with the stature as Neil Garsuch.  Did people really elect Franken to be their senator?  I find that incredibly hard to believe.

I guess it’s Franken’s right to interview an incoming supreme court justice, but I bet I’m not the only one thinking “Ha, this is the face of the Democratic Party”.

Share the Lunacy

Fareed Zakaria, the most unbiased journalist in the business goes mental on Trump

Unbiased, LOL.  This buffoon went full retard on President Trump on Don Lemon’s show.  You could just see the hate in his eyes.  I wonder if he considers himself to be a journalist?  He probably does except he feels the need to educate us with his infinite wisdom.  I usually throw down a link to the story, but I’m not even going to for this idiot.  All you have to do is Google his name to see the exchange.  I decided to put this tool in the White Hair Journos category, but could have just as easily placed him with the Unhinged or Deranged folks.

Share the Lunacy

My name is Steve, I’m a Climate Change denier

The following is EXACTLY how I feel about climate change. This guy must have read my mind before he wrote this. He probably explains our beliefs a little more eloquently than I would have.

Why I am a Climate Change Skeptic
March 20, 2015
PATRICK MOORE
Dr. Patrick Moore is the co-founder, chair, and chief scientist of Greenspirit Strategies

[Editor’s Note: Patrick Moore, Ph.D., has been a leader in international environmentalism for more than 40 years. He cofounded Greenpeace and currently serves as chair of Allow Golden Rice. Moore received the 2014 Speaks Truth to Power Award at the Ninth International Conference on Climate Change, July 8, in Las Vegas.

I am skeptical humans are the main cause of climate change and that it will be catastrophic in the near future. There is no scientific proof of this hypothesis, yet we are told “the debate is over” and “the science is settled.”

My skepticism begins with the believers’ certainty they can predict the global climate with a computer model. The entire basis for the doomsday climate change scenario is the hypothesis increased atmospheric carbon dioxide due to fossil fuel emissions will heat the Earth to unlivable temperatures.

In fact, the Earth has been warming very gradually for 300 years, since the Little Ice Age ended, long before heavy use of fossil fuels. Prior to the Little Ice Age, during the Medieval Warm Period, Vikings colonized Greenland and Newfoundland, when it was warmer there than today. And during Roman times, it was warmer, long before fossil fuels revolutionized civilization.

The idea that it would be catastrophic if carbon dioxide were to increase and average global temperature were to rise a few degrees is preposterous.

Recently, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) announced for the umpteenth time we are doomed unless we reduce carbon-dioxide emissions to zero. Effectively this means either reducing the population to zero, or going back 10,000 years before humans began clearing forests for agriculture. This proposed cure is far worse than adapting to a warmer world, if it actually comes about.

IPCC Conflict of Interest

By its constitution, the IPCC has a hopeless conflict of interest. Its mandate is to consider only the human causes of global warming, not the many natural causes changing the climate for billions of years. We don’t understand the natural causes of climate change any more than we know if humans are part of the cause at present. If the IPCC did not find humans were the cause of warming, or if it found warming would be more positive than negative, there would be no need for the IPCC under its present mandate. To survive, it must find on the side of the apocalypse.
The IPCC should either have its mandate expanded to include all causes of climate change, or it should be dismantled.

Political Powerhouse

Climate change has become a powerful political force for many reasons. First, it is universal; we are told everything on Earth is threatened. Second, it invokes the two most powerful human motivators: fear and guilt. We fear driving our car will kill our grandchildren, and we feel guilty for doing it.

Third, there is a powerful convergence of interests among key elites that support the climate “narrative.” Environmentalists spread fear and raise donations; politicians appear to be saving the Earth from doom; the media has a field day with sensation and conflict; science institutions raise billions in grants, create whole new departments, and stoke a feeding frenzy of scary scenarios; business wants to look green, and get huge public subsidies for projects that would otherwise be economic losers, such as wind farms and solar arrays. Fourth, the Left sees climate change as a perfect means to redistribute wealth from industrial countries to the developing world and the UN bureaucracy.

So we are told carbon dioxide is a “toxic” “pollutant” that must be curtailed, when in fact it is a colorless, odorless, tasteless, gas and the most important food for life on earth. Without carbon dioxide above 150 parts per million, all plants would die.

Human Emissions Saved Planet

Over the past 150 million years, carbon dioxide had been drawn down steadily (by plants) from about 3,000 parts per million to about 280 parts per million before the Industrial Revolution. If this trend continued, the carbon dioxide level would have become too low to support life on Earth. Human fossil fuel use and clearing land for crops have boosted carbon dioxide from its lowest level in the history of the Earth back to 400 parts per million today.

At 400 parts per million, all our food crops, forests, and natural ecosystems are still on a starvation diet for carbon dioxide. The optimum level of carbon dioxide for plant growth, given enough water and nutrients, is about 1,500 parts per million, nearly four times higher than today. Greenhouse growers inject carbon-dioxide to increase yields. Farms and forests will produce more if carbon-dioxide keeps rising.

We have no proof increased carbon dioxide is responsible for the earth’s slight warming over the past 300 years. There has been no significant warming for 18 years while we have emitted 25 per cent of all the carbon dioxide ever emitted. Carbon dioxide is vital for life on Earth and plants would like more of it. Which should we emphasize to our children?

Celebrate Carbon Dioxide

The IPCC’s followers have given us a vision of a world dying because of carbon-dioxide emissions. I say the Earth would be a lot deader with no carbon dioxide, and more of it will be a very positive factor in feeding the world. Let’s celebrate carbon dioxide.

Patrick Moore (pmoore@nullallowgoldenricenow.org) was a cofounder and leader of Greenpeace for 15 years. He is now chair and spokesman for Allow Golden Rice.

Share the Lunacy

Mammals shrink due to global warming, yes it’s a story.

(Florida Museum of Natural History, illustration by Danielle Byerley via AP)

The first sentence in this piece says it all for me.  “Global warming shrank certain animals in the ancient past, and scientists think it could happen again.”  Did anyone notice the words “ancient past”?  It’s EXACTLY what I’ve been preaching about the climate change argument.  The Earth warms, then it cools.  It’s been doing it at least since it rendered the Neanderthals null and void.  You can read about that as part of my Climate Change category description HERE.

It looks like this originated on the Associated Press (shocker), but I’m going to share the link to where I found it, The Mercury News. Yes, the world renowned Mercury News.  It amuses me.  I have to give them props where props are due, kudos to the Mercury News web designer, it’s a really nice looking site.  Here’s their link to the story Shrinking Mammals.  This is not an endorsement, but you should check out their home page, it’s very nicely laid out.

Share the Lunacy

Sean Spicer Gets Verbally Attacked By Psychopath Woman at Apple Store

Your lightning cable breaks as usual and you decide to go to the local Apple store for a new one.  You just landed one of the coolest jobs on earth, you’re feeling good, you find your cable, and some psychopathic woman starts screaming at you.  What ever happened to “Hi I don’t agree with your politics, but how about a picture?”

I can’t figure out if this succuba is deranged or PMS-ing.  Apparently women can’t control their hormones before their menstrual cycle.  Is this true?  If it is, would anyone feel safe putting a woman in higher office?  I wouldn’t, especially because menopause hormones are ten times worse.  Please don’t ask me how I know.

Wow, did that go on a tangent.  I apologize if anyone got offended, it wasn’t intended to be sexist sounding.  It did give me an idea for another Loons Category.

 

Anyway here’s the video of that nut case attacking Spicer.


 

Share the Lunacy

Snoop Dogg Makes A Special Video for President Trump, It’s Precious

 

Ah yes, another gem from the brain surgeons in Hollywood.  Not sure if this imbecile is a racist, uninformed, high, or mentally ill.  I’m thinking all of the above.  Made a new video where he rants as usual and towards the end he pretends to shoot the president.

 

Share the Lunacy

Barbara Streisand says that Trump is Making her gain weight

Babs looking like TravoltaI seriously doubt that Donald Trump is making Barbara Streisand gain weight.  Could it be the fact that she can’t keep her pie hole shut?  Can someone please tell me why anyone would take her opinion on politics seriously?

Check out the picture.  Is it me or does she look like John Travolta with long hair?

Here’s the story.

Share the Lunacy
1 2 3 4